I. Critique of the New Legislation
In his statement on January 31, 2022, Alberto Yelmo delivered a robust critique against the recent Law 11/2021, arguing that its implementation could result in defenselessness for athletes. The removal of a second administrative instance, which should be impartial and institutionally independent, represents a significant setback in protecting athletes’ rights, limiting their ability to appeal decisions that can have a profound impact on their professional careers and reputation.
II. Repercussions for Athletes
Yelmo’s position highlights the importance of maintaining a legal system that offers athletes all the procedural guarantees needed to defend themselves adequately in doping cases. The suppression of an appeal instance not only goes against the principles of justice and equity but also risks the credibility and transparency of the legal process in the sports field.
III. Call for Reflection and Action
This statement in Congress seeks to motivate a debate on the need to review and possibly amend Law 11/2021, aiming to reintroduce the second administrative instance. It calls on lawmakers and sports bodies to consider the implications of this law and work together to find solutions that safeguard athletes’ rights, aligning with international standards set by the World Anti-Doping Agency.
